Nothing but the death penalty... Debate on stray dogs on social media, know who is saying what

While Resident Welfare Associations (RWA) welcomed the Supreme Court's order on stray dogs, animal rights activists argued that municipal bodies lacked land and funds to carry out such a mammoth task. Know who is saying what.

Those who welcomed the Supreme Court's order to remove stray dogs from Delhi-NCR and those who disliked it have come face to face. A big debate (Debate on Stray Dogs) has started between the two groups on social media. In fact, on Monday, the court had strictly instructed the Delhi government and the municipal bodies of Gurugram, Noida and Ghaziabad to immediately remove stray dogs from all areas and keep them in shelter homes. Also, the court said that these dogs should not be sent back to the streets.

People on social media have been divided into two groups on this decision of the court. Some people are in support of this decision while some people are strongly against it. In fact, Resident Welfare Associations (RWA) welcomed this order of the Supreme Court, while animal rights activists argued that municipal bodies lack land and funds to do this big work. They warned that this could make human-dog conflict even worse. Know who is saying what.

These people supported the decision of the Supreme Court

One user wrote, "Dear stray dog lovers, if you are so upset with the Supreme Court's decision to remove stray dogs from the streets, please bring some dogs home and give them a loving home. Bear the cost of their vaccination, training, and treatment. Stick to your word. Feeding stale rotis from your house to stray dogs does not make you an animal rights activist!"

Another user wrote, "No one should have to put their 3-year-old child's life at risk just because someone, somewhere, is being kind to stray dogs. That's it."

An ex-user wrote, "If you don't know about the situation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, ask those who work in night shifts. I myself am a dog lover, but this menace of stray dogs must stop. I support the Supreme Court's decision."

A woman worker of Bihar All India Congress said, the Supreme Court's decision to shift stray dogs to shelters in Delhi-NCR is welcome. This decision should be implemented in the whole country. Also, a law should be made against those people who think they are doing a very virtuous deed by feeding biscuits and bread to these stray dogs on the road. It has become difficult to walk on the road because of these people.

The former mayor of Karol Bagh area of Delhi wrote, I am thankful to the Supreme Court for passing the order to rid the entire Delhi of the terror of stray dogs. The hard work done 10 years ago while I was the mayor of Delhi to shift stray dogs from the streets of Delhi to shelter homes has borne fruit today.

These people are opposing the decision of the Supreme Court

One Twitter user said, "The problem with the Supreme Court's decision on stray dogs is that it is a matter of fate that humans feed dogs. No claim of superiority in this matter. There is no guarantee that this will always happen. Yet we use our privilege to justify the destruction of other species. The Supreme Court's order on stray dogs not only lacks empathy but also shows ignorance of basic evolutionary biology."

An x user wrote, "If you have never loved a stray dog, you have been deprived of its purest love. This is your loss only. This court decision not only breaks laws but also compassion. It violates the Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023 and bypasses animal welfare laws. It violates the duties imposed on us by our Constitution.

One user wrote, "The Supreme Court's order on stray dogs in Delhi is nothing but a death sentence for every stray dog living in every street of the capital. Every one of us has to raise our voice against this."

One user wrote, "Hopefully this will be done with compassion, proper facilities and their wellbeing in mind, so that every wagging tail feels comforted instead of scared."

PC:NDTVINDIA/ The Daily Jagran